So having watched Francis Ford Coppola's Bram Stoker's Dracula (BSD) recently on Netflix, I stumbled upon this other Netflix series and decided to give my review on it. I will state right at the outset that I highly recommend this series. It's only 3 episodes long at around an hour and a half each episode, so it's quite a quick binge-watch. But I do think it's a fantastic series and highly recommend it. A basic summary:
The series starts off as though it will be a faithful adaptation of the book, and I feel that sets things up quite nicely for the various twists and revelations that eventually come. From there, the details of the book and characters do show up but in far different ways, however it's all delivered in a manner that doesn't feel too jarring. I will admit that it sort of threw me off at the beginning because I did think they were trying to be faithful to the book. But once they introduced certain characters and when Jonathan Harker in particular started experiencing various things that were not in the book, I realized that I could not adhere to any expectations. It's a very good re-imagining of the story with some elements that are great and some that are not so great. The costumes, special effects and environments are amazing, especially in 1897 in Transylvania and on board the Demeter.
I will reveal that one of my biggest gripes is that the series ended far, far too soon. They needed at least one more episode to really bring the story to a satisfying conclusion, especially as it pertained to Dracula and his apparent weaknesses as a vampire. I was very impressed with the psychological aspect. I loved how they sort of re-invented the powers and weaknesses of Dracula while keeping some of the tried and true elements of past depictions but, like I said, the ending left a little to be desired and I think it's because they should have had at least one more episode to solidify what they were trying to do with Dracula and his psychological fears. There are plenty of satisfying twists and turns that keep you surprised and the ending of the first two episodes are very well done, leaving you on a cliffhanger that you have to see what happens next! I think it's a worthy retelling of the famous Count Dracula story and I do recommend folks go and see it.
I will be going over the series in detail so do watch the series and come back and read my review of it to see if you agree or not.
*SPOILERS AHEAD*
I think what I liked most about this Dracula was that he was a monster through and through, literally up until the very end (which I'm a bit iffy about). Having watched Coppola's BSD, where Gary Oldman's Dracula was more of a softy and was all romantic and shit (and that has it's place in vampire lore, I suppose), this Dracula wasn't any of that. He wasn't looking to find love or seduce Mina Harker into becoming his bride or establish an eternal love. In fact, when he saw a picture of Mina, he really didn't react at all, which was refreshing after having watched BSD. No, this Dracula was all about himself...and blood!
This was fucking brilliant! The makeup was excellent and again, props to the actress because I swear she had that Brundlefly thing going! I do wonder what she would have looked like had she not been cremated (which was brutal considering she was awake throughout the whole process). Suddenly she got what she wanted (immortality) but at a cost: her beauty. The one thing she had felt was a negative in her life suddenly became the one thing she cared about losing the most. And I suppose to Dracula's credit, he saw past the charred flesh and disfigurement and was intrigued by her spirit and her mind and her lack of fear when it came to death. He didn't care what she looked like and was content to keep her around forever (until he became bored with her, of course). He didn't really care about her at all. Again, she was an experiment, a toy that just didn't work out. He shed no tears and felt no remorse when she died. She was just another in a long line of broken toys.
I loved it because it removed all the romanticism and allure of being a bride of Dracula or being a vampire. You didn't get to stay young and beautiful forever. You didn't become this cool or aristocratic immortal who could live forever, feeding off of humans while having the time of your life. To quote The Lost Boys poster:
Now I had mentioned that there elements that weren't so great and I truly believe that these elements were brought about because they only dedicated three episodes to this series. They should have had four. They should have had two episodes taking place in the late 19th century and two taking place in the here and now. I felt like having only one episode in the here and now rushed things and either didn't set up the final revelations about Dracula adequately or left a lot of loose ends that needed tying up and characters/institutions that weren't used to their full effect.
One revelation that I wasn't a fan of simply because there wasn't enough of a build up were Dracula's weaknesses. The idea that Dracula was repelled by the cross or was afraid of sunlight or could not enter into a dwelling unless invited in....that all these 'weaknesses' were mere habits that he adopted throughout the centuries made no sense. I think I get what they were trying to do, to create this sense of irony as it pertained to Dracula finally being free. Once it was revealed that the sun didn't burn him or that he could very well enter into anyone's house without an invitation suddenly removed major obstacles to him taking over the world, so to speak. That he was suddenly free from these inhibitors meant he was essentially unstoppable. But it was when he was unstoppable that he decided he needed to stop. Like I said, I get the ironic twist to it and I can appreciate it but they needed another episode to set this up properly.
I just found it unbelievable that in 500 years of existence, Dracula never tested those limitations. He never let his hand stand in the sun to see if it burned. He never pushed through a doorway into someone's house just to see if he could do it. I'll have to give credit to the TVD universe here because that's what every vampire on that show did....they tested their limitations. I find it hard to believe that Dracula never did that and he feared the sun and the cross and couldn't enter into people's homes simply based on the idea that he too, out of habit, came to believe the folklore surrounding vampires.
Regarding his fear of the cross, I can appreciate that he feared it not because of the holiness implied by it, but by the symbolism of Jesus giving himself over to death, something that Dracula apparently could never do. While I'm quite content with the mystery of how Dracula became a vampire (as sometimes the origin story can be quite disappointing....BSD had a very disappointing origin for Oldman's Dracula), I felt like they kept hinting at a story that we should have seen. Dracula himself says that he was a warlord and Zoe went on about how Dracula's brother and father and sons all died in battle while he remained alive unnaturally, all because he feared death. Whether they were hinting that he was, in fact, Vlad The Impaler is never answered, but it's at least hinted at.
I wasn't a fan of this ending, mainly because there was no logical reason for Dracula to finally embrace death when he was truly free to do whatever he wanted. And the manner of death was disappointing. The idea that drinking Zoe's blood because she had cancer and was thus "dying," and therefore her blood was poisonous to him because a vampire can't drink the blood of someone dying, made little to no sense. As Dracula himself pointed out: "You're mortal. You've been dying since the day you were born." I felt like they gave in and did what they had spent the whole series avoiding doing: giving Dracula a romantic edge. Him dying and creating this illusion of making love to Zoe as he slowly drained her life as a way to not allow her to feel pain, while erotic to a degree, wasn't consistent. He had spent the majority of the series lacking any degree of empathy towards anybody, but for his final act, he shows it?



























































